The Royal Canadian Navy’s (RCN) four Victoria-class submarines are showing their age, although they are expected to remain in service well into the 2030s. Mindful that the Canadian procurement process is typically a long and arduous process, the Department of National Defence (DND) has created the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project (CPSP) to look into replacements for the existing sub fleet.
It’s been reported that the RCN is readying itself for the purchase of up to 12 new submarines at a cost of $60 billion, according to National Defence and industry sources.
When it comes to buying new subs under the CPSP, the RCN needs “at least eight” and possibly 12, said VAdm Topshee, during an interview with CDR in 2023. “If you want to have a single line of tasking with a submarine in the Pacific, you need four boats based in Victoria,” he explained. “You want to guarantee the availability of a submarine to do anything you need it to do in the Atlantic, so you need four boats based in Halifax. [Then] if you also want to be able to do the Arctic, you better find a place to put [another] four boats between those two places.”
On September 15th, Canada officially released an RFI to industry for the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project. Respondents are encouraged to provide their initial feedback by November 18, 2024. This feedback will also help inform the procurement process moving forward.
In addition to the RFI, as part of this procurement process, Canada continues to meet with officials from allied and partner countries, and companies and navies in Europe and Asia that currently have, or are in the process of, building submarines that may meet Canada’s requirements.
Possible contenders include:
- Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems-Canada – Offering the Type 212CD
- Navantia – Offering the S-80
- Read our latest cover story on Navantia.
- Hanwha Ocean/HD Hyundai Heavy Industries – Offering the Ahn Changho-class
- Saab/Damen Shipyards – C-71
To avoid any gaps in Canadian submarine capabilities, Canada anticipates a contract award by 2028, with the delivery of the first replacement submarine no later than 2035. These efforts are part of Canada’s plan to increase its defence spending ratio in relation to gross domestic product.
“As Canada’s Arctic is becoming increasingly accessible, Canada needs reliable maritime capabilities to maintain our country’s security. As such, we are committed to building a more agile, better-equipped military, while ensuring that these new contracts benefit our businesses, workers and Canadians. The procurement of new submarines for the Royal Canadian Navy will enhance our ability to monitor and detect threats along our coastlines, and protect Canadians.”
The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos
Minister of Public Services and Procurement
“As an Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific nation with the world’s longest coastline, Canada needs a new fleet of submarines. The procurement of up to 12 conventionally-powered, under-ice capable submarines for the Royal Canadian Navy will enhance Canada’s ability to detect and deter maritime threats, control our maritime approaches, and project power and striking capabilities further from our shores. We look forward to working with industry partners to implement this crucial project, in support of the priorities outlined in Our North, Strong and Free.”
The Honourable Bill Blair
Minister of National Defence“The government remains committed to providing the Royal Canadian Navy with the critical platforms and equipment needed to protect Canada’s sovereignty and security. We look forward to receiving feedback from interested parties as part of this engagement and seeing how they intend to contribute to Canada’s long-term economic growth and industrial resiliency.”
The Honourable François-Philippe Champagne
Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry
ADDITIONAL INFO
- The Victoria-class submarines currently in use were commissioned between 1990 and 1993 and purchased used from the Royal Navy (UK) in 1998.
- The first three Victoria-class submarines were accepted into RCN service between 2000 and 2003. The fourth submarine suffered a fire in transit to Canada in 2004, which delayed its acceptance into RCN service until 2015.
- The current submarine fleet will remain operational into the mid-to late 2030s via the Victoria-class Modernization (VCM) project.
- The RCN requires its first new submarine to be delivered by the mid-2030s to ensure transition between classes without capability gaps.
- The RFI engages on other key elements including in-service support, training and infrastructure for the new submarine fleet, including how partnerships with Canadian industry could be leveraged to create economic benefits in Canada throughout the lifecycle of the fleet.
- The Canadian Patrol Submarine Project was established in 2021 to inform timely governmental decision-making about a potential replacement class of submarines and avoid any gap in Canadian submarine capabilities.
- Canada’s key submarine capability requirements will be stealth, lethality, persistence and Arctic deployability – meaning that the submarine must have extended range and endurance.
- Canada’s new fleet will need to provide a unique combination of these requirements to ensure that Canada can detect, track, deter and, if necessary, defeat adversaries in all three of Canada’s oceans while contributing meaningfully alongside allies and enabling the Government of Canada to deploy this fleet abroad in support of our partners and allies.






26 thoughts on “DND Releases RFI for Canadian Patrol Submarine Project (CPSP) with Responses Due by November 18th”
Like everything else it will drag on and on. They bought lemons from the Brits and did they learn a lesson nope
Well they bought used… let’s hope and pray they learn from that… lol
Used for like a day or two….. two of the four never had even one day use. They never entered service in the UK. Not new but not used either – one might say!
Canada bought good boats for sure 🙂
David
They were good boats buddy….. of course there is always challenges in running a Submarine fleet. Blaming the boats is like blaming your tools when things don’t work out the way you hoped!
I am surprised that the French option is not listed (Short Fin Barraccuda) which is what the Dutch Navy is procurring.
Also what about the Japanese Taigei SS29 Class submarine with LIBs? It would be a “game changer” as well.
This is hilarious! The current boats will be used well into the thirties! Expect that to be the forties as the likelihood of Procurement Canada making a decision in 10 years is remote. That brings us to 2034++! Then contracts to be signed and mfg starts. Probably you’ll see a reduced number boats and that will be in the 2050s’
We need these subs yesterday!Typical of the liberal goverment!Money for everthing but defence!Always same ol same ol! O wait,Putin,the Chinese or mYve North Korea or Iran will just wait til we catch up!
Liberals on solely responsible for the unwillingness to support defe ce spending. Harper’s last year in power, spent .99 percent of GDP! Many of the procurement issues were because Harper’s government gutted the procurement departments to save money. That said, Liberals haven’t been a lot better, although spending has increased under them, rather than continued to decline.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/810367/ratio-of-military-expenditure-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp-canada/
All parties in the federal gov are the same. All mouth and no action.
Typical of every Canadian government liberal or conservative.
Exactamundo. Lots of gab of the process. Very little process.
All of our forces need a total up grade.
We are a very large country with poor protections. Are men and women should have the best equipment available along with the best training.
We don’t need to be aggressive but we need to be able to defend ourselves and help our nation in emergency situations ( flooding, forest fires, earthquakes and what ever other catatonic emergencies are nation has).
It’s happening based on recent purchase committments
Agreed
With uncle Bill in the drivers seat.
It will be like pulling teeth.
Our military is an embarrassment..
Our military is not an embarrassment the people that are in charge are.
Namely government of any stripe lt has always been that way in Canada.
Ask any vets.
Well said.
Are ? Or our
Are men. Are nation has or our men. Our nation has. Which.
Liberals on solely responsible for the unwillingness to support defe ce spending. Harper’s last year in power, spent .99 percent of GDP! Many of the procurement issues were because Harper’s government gutted the procurement departments to save money. That said, Liberals haven’t been a lot better, although spending has increased under them, rather than continued to decline.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/810367/ratio-of-military-expenditure-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp-canada/
I do not like the part about “up to twelve” submarines … that means that we will never get anything near the twelve submarines that we will need to patrol our three oceans. Just get the twelve submarines regardless of the cost in three groups of four submarines spread out every few years to accommodate the time required to train of the crews for them.
Obviously we need nuclear… but knowing how passive we are..🤦
Wake up Canadians.
Your country is broken. Years of infrastructure neglect. Canadians have never wanted, and continue to believe that the white Gods in Ottawa work tirelessly in your best interests…..wrong.
Meanwhile as you tend your bar be ques and chilled beer…white asses bearing the plumes of indigenous peoples are making a mockery of a country.
Take your blinders off and look overseas at European countries that enjoy a standard of living X 100 of Canadians with less than 1/100 the resources.
Canadians are a lazy bunch of non entrepreneurial complainers. $20B of submarines Anita going to solve your issues.
Cheers
One of a few hard working overtaxed entrepreneurial Canadians. Born in Europe!
I also believe we need to give our military the equipment they need. Every government since the end of WW2 has been slowly watering down our capabilities. Why? The US is not going to protect us which seems to be the belief with a lot of people. We are a sovereign nation we need to do this ourselves. Our procurement process is terrible. Anything that one party in power starts the next stops it to start all over again. This ends up costing the tax payer more money with nothing to show for it. Stop messing around with our military before we end up in a war that we will loose because we are not equipped to fight it. Shame on ALL of the politicians who have caused this.
If they bypass ‘procurement’ like they did with the C17’s, then there’s hope. It will have to be an MOTS
purchase as we do not have the ability in any shape or form to be build these things. The infrastructure to support them ‘later’ like maintenance and the like, can be ramped up over time as they come online, but not the initial build. That would be worth investing in with skills, technology and all for our industrial base. We have to stop bickering like a bunch of old hens about this. All of it won’t matter if and when the RF or PRC parks a mothership somewhere in Hudson Bay or somewhere and we’re not ready for it. Wars are ‘come as you are’.. We are grossly under equipped. Stay safe.
Comments are closed.